|
|
|
I. NOT THE
END!
VI. COMA
THEORY
VII.
THEFT
THEORY
III.
WRONG TOMB
THEORY
VIII.
YOUR
CONCLUSION
The story of Jesus does not end in a tomb. You can pay homage to the remains of Mohammed and Buddha and countless other religious teachers, but the tomb of Jesus Christ is empty. Death could not hold Him.
Jesus Christ rose from the dead just as David and Isaiah had prophesied. The various appearances of the risen Savior are found in Matthew 28, Mark 16, Luke 24, John 20-21, and Acts l:3-11; 9:1-19, and Revelation 1:9-20. In addition, 1 Corinthians 15 contains a detailed discussion of the resurrection. It will certainly be worth your while to read these chapters, for they relate the details of the greatest event of all history. Because of this event Easter Sunday should be the biggest holiday of the entire year. Christ triumphed over death! He has returned the victor and shares His victory of life with all who confess His name from the heart. II. IS THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST BELIEVABLE?
The Apostle Thomas reacted like many modern men, doubting that Christ had risen from the death. But before long, he also had to admit the truth of this unparalleled event. Knowing that the disciples would need ample evidence of His resurrection, Jesus appeared to them many times, proving to them again and again that He was really alive. Those who reject the resurrection do so in spite of the eyewitness evidence that is found in the Holy Scriptures. There is as much historical evidence for the resurrection for Christ as there is for any other event in history. No one doubts that the Roman Empire fell in the 4th century A.D., or that the Incas had a great civilization before Pizarro. And these events have the same amount of historical evidence as the resurrection of Jesus. Down through the years people have proposed several theories to explain away the resurrection of Christ. Let us consider them one by one. This is the idea that the women went to the wrong tomb on the Sunday morning after Jesus died. Finding the tomb empty, they assumed that Jesus had risen.
Jesus was not buried in a cemetery filled with many graves. It was a garden near Calvary that happened to have a tomb in it. Furthermore, the women knew exactly where the body had been placed as Luke 23:55 indicates. Even on the improbable occurrence that they might have gone to the wrong tomb, they would quickly have been shown their error by the Roman soldiers who guarded the right tomb, by the Jewish authorities, or by Joseph of Arimathea, the owner of the tomb. The rumors of Christ's resurrection would have been immediately silenced by the simple act of going to the right tomb and finding the body. The historical fact is that the women went to the correct grave, and it was empty. IV. THE BODY-WAS-MOVED THEORY. Some people conjecture that Jesus' body must have been moved to another tomb. Who would have done it? Some propose the Roman soldiers, others say the Jews, others Joseph of Arimathea, and yet others claim that Christ's body was moved by the gardener who tended the property. Where is the historical evidence to support this theory? There is none. It is simply the invention of skeptical minds. Even if the body of Christ had been moved, all that was needed was for the person who had moved it to say, "No, you disciples are mistaken, Jesus did not rise from the dead. I moved the body, and here it is." These first two arguments against the resurrection are very shallow, and few people today hold to them. However, quite a few people believe in the next three theories. Let us see if any of them is reasonable. This is the view that the people who claim to have seen Jesus risen from the dead were actually seeing hallucinations. What can be said about this theory? 1. Psychologists inform us that such self-deception never happens in groups of people. But Christ was seen by many people, sometimes ten or more people were present, and the Apostle Paul mentions one case of Jesus appearing to 500 people at once (See Matthew 28:16-17; John 20:19-29; and 1 Corinthians 15:6). 2. Hallucinations are restricted as to when and where they occur. They are usually experienced in a place with nostalgic atmosphere, or at a time which particularly brings the person to a mood of recalling the past. However, the risen Christ appeared to His followers in a variety of places and times. Furthermore, His appearances were not fleeting glimpses, but prolonged visits that included long conversations and meals. 3. In order to have an hallucination, one's imagination must be ruled by an intense desire to see something or someone. But in the case of the disciples, they were not expecting a resurrection. Against their own doubts and skepticism Jesus had to convince them to believe that He had really returned from the dead (See Luke 24:36-43 and John 20:24-29). 4. Finally, the hallucination theory fails to explain why the tomb was empty. If the disciples had imagined the whole thing, all the authorities had to do was get the body from the tomb, put it on a wagon, and drive it through the streets of Jerusalem. This is the claim that Christ did not really die on the cross, but rather He fell into a coma and later revived.
1. The Roman soldiers affirmed that Christ had died. These men were professional executioners who would not have made a mistake.
2. Jesus' friends saw Him die and entertained no hopes that He had somehow survived the crucifixion, which was the most severe form of execution of ancient times. With his own eyes the Apostle John saw a soldier pierce the Savior's side. He reported that blood and water flowed out of Christ's side. Doctors today recognize this flow of fluids as convincing evidence that Jesus had indeed expired. 3. In addition, those who hold to the coma theory are forced to give a logical explanation for the following unlikely occurrences:
Clearly, the coma theory is more incredible than the resurrection. This is the oldest of all arguments against the resurrection. The Apostle Matthew tells us how it came into existence.
Is the theft theory plausible? 1. The depression and cowardice of the disciples argues against it. They had abandoned Jesus upon His arrest (Mark 14:66-72). All of them were thoroughly disillusioned by the death of their leader of whom they had expected so much. They were in no mood to dare to attack a detachment of well-armed soldiers and snatch the body out of the tomb. 2. Even if the disciples had attempted to steal the body, they would have been killed. The Roman soldier was the most stalwart and well-trained fighting man in the world. The soldiers would have made mincemeat out of non-professional fighters such as the disciples. 3. The claim is made that the soldiers fell asleep. However, Roman soldiers were not prone to fall asleep. Why? Because it was death for a Roman sentinel to snooze at his post, and this law was rigidly enforced. In light of this fact, it is impossible that all of them could have fallen asleep when they had been stationed there for the very purpose to see that the body was not stolen. And one other question: Even if they had fallen asleep, how then did the disciples roll away the stone without making a loud racket? 4. If the soldiers were snoozing, how could they know that the disciples stole the body? What judge would listen to you if you said that while you were sleeping, your neighbor came into your house and stole your television? Who knows what goes on while he is asleep? Testimony like this would be thrown out of any court. [Paul Little, Know Why You Believe, Scripture Press, 1971, p. 63,64] 5. The most convincing argument against the theft theory is the drastic change that took place in the apostles. They had been a disillusioned, cowardly bunch. Then suddenly they were transformed into bold witnesses of the resurrection of Jesus Christ (See Acts 4:17-20). They dedicated their entire lives to spreading this message to the world, without receiving any material or financial benefit for themselves. What caused this turnabout? The Bible says it was caused by the rising of a man from the dead. Those who believe the theft theory must say that it was caused by the crime of stealing the body, followed by the falsehood of proclaiming that Jesus had returned to life. Tell me, would you die for a lie? The Watergate Scandal of the 1970's is an example of how people are unwilling to be persecuted for what they know to be a lie. At first, President Nixon's aides tried to maintain a united front against the investigators and the press. But before long, they were ratting on each other in order to save their own hides. None of them was in danger of losing his life. Yet, even so, they turned on each other and revealed the truth, in the hope that they could thus bargain a lighter sentence from the judge. Men do not die for what they know to be a lie. All the Apostles of Jesus were persecuted for their beliefs, and all but John were martyred for their faith. To save their skins all they had to do was say, "Look, it was all a hoax. Jesus did not really rise." But instead the apostles went to their deaths proclaiming what they knew to be an historical fact--Jesus Christ rose from the dead! VIII. WHAT IS YOUR CONCLUSION? A. The example of Thomas.
Previously Thomas had refused to believe that Christ was alive again. Faced with the evidence, He confessed that Christ was his Lord and God.
B. Consider the evidence. If God became man, then we would expect Him to do many astounding things.
C. Consider the logical options. It is common to hear people say, "I believe Jesus was the greatest humanitarian and moral teacher the world has ever known. But I don't believe He was God." This opinion is held by many folks who picture themselves as well-educated, clear-thinking, and logical. There is only one thing wrong with their opinion. It is totally illogical. Anyone who falsely claimed to be God and deceived billions of people, does not deserve to be praised as a great teacher and humanitarian. If you have entertained this opinion, I urge you to recognize how preposterous it is, reject it, and then weigh the logical options that remain. What, then, are our alternatives? Either Christ's claims were true or they were false. If they were false, He was either a liar or a lunatic. If they were true, then He must be who He claimed to be--God. These are the only logical possibilities. Jesus Christ was either a con-man, a mad man, or the one and only God-man. The evidence, as you have seen, is wholly in favor of Jesus being God. You have seen the evidence of fulfilled prophecies, each one a miracle. You have seen the evidence that Christ gave His life to pay the price for the sins of the world, including yours and mine. You have seen the undeniable evidence for Christ's resurrection. Will you accept the evidence or reject it? There is no neutral ground. BRIDGE TO LESSON 5 In the first four lessons we have learned much about Jesus Christ, who claimed to be God. Learning is one thing. Believing it is another. If you've been a doubter in the past, how will you come to believe? We'll investigate this question in Lesson 5: God Can Change You. © 1989 Philip M. Bickel Unless otherwise noted, Scripture quotations taken from the HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION. Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society. |